News report ₿ Crypto 🌍 EUROPE

Hyperliquid and Circle Lobby European Commission on MiCA and MiFID II Rules

Crypto firms Hyperliquid and Circle are actively lobbying European regulators to adjust MiFID II and MiCA frameworks, seeking to influence derivatives trading and stablecoin reserve requirements.

🕐 1 min read

2 assets impacted (Crypto). Net bias: 0 Bullish, 0 Bearish, 2 Neutral. Strongest signal: HYPE → 4/10 (55% confidence).

📊 Affected Assets (2)

HYPE
Neutral 🤖 55%
📆 Mid-term 🌍 EUROPE · Explicit

Hyperliquid's policy group is actively lobbying for perpetual futures (perps) to be classified under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) framework. This strategic move aims to align their derivatives trading operations with established EU financial regulations, potentially providing a clearer legal pathway for their services within the European market.

Catalysts
  • • Formal lobbying efforts to classify perps under MiFID II
  • • European Commission's ongoing MiCA review process
Risk Factors
  • • Potential for regulators to reject MiFID II classification in favor of stricter or alternative frameworks
  • • Increased compliance costs associated with MiFID II standards
▼ Show FAQ (1) ▲ Hide FAQ
What is Hyperliquid's goal regarding EU regulation?

Hyperliquid is advocating for its perpetual futures products to be regulated under the MiFID II framework.

USDC
Neutral 🤖 52%
📆 Mid-term 🌍 EUROPE · Explicit

Circle is lobbying against MiCA's bank deposit floor for stablecoin reserves, which could affect USDC's reserve management and competitiveness in the EU.

🎯 Key Takeaways

  • Hyperliquid seeks to classify perpetual derivatives under the MiFID II regulatory regime.
  • Circle is pushing back against MiCA's mandatory bank deposit floors for stablecoin reserves.
  • Both firms are engaging with the European Commission's ongoing MiCA review process.

📝 Executive Summary

Hyperliquid's policy arm is advocating for perpetual derivatives to fall under MiFID II regulations, signaling a shift in its European operational strategy. Simultaneously, Circle is challenging the bank deposit floor requirements for stablecoin reserves within the MiCA framework, aiming to reshape reserve management standards for USDC.

❓ FAQ

Why is Hyperliquid advocating for MiFID II classification?

Hyperliquid's policy group aims to bring perpetual derivatives under the MiFID II framework to clarify the regulatory status of its trading operations in Europe.

What is Circle's primary concern regarding MiCA?

Circle is lobbying against the bank deposit floor requirements for stablecoin reserves, arguing that these rules could impact the competitiveness and management of USDC.