News report ₿ Crypto 🌍 GLOBAL

Zilliqa, Gnosis and Ronin Shift to Ethereum as L1 Costs Become Unsustainable

Zilliqa, Gnosis, and Ronin are abandoning independent L1 architectures for Ethereum-based L2 models, seeking to leverage shared security and liquidity as the costs of maintaining standalone networks become prohibitive for smaller projects.

🕐 1 min read

2 assets impacted (Crypto). Net bias: 1 Bullish, 0 Bearish, 1 Neutral. Strongest signal: ETH ↑ 5/10 (65% confidence).

📊 Affected Assets (2)

ETH
Bullish 🤖 65%
📆 Mid-term 🌍 GLOBAL · Explicit

Zilliqa, Gnosis and Ronin are all moving to Ethereum-based architectures, with Gnosis targeting spring 2027 for its transition and its Ethereum Economic Zone described as a potential 'black hole for liquidity' tapping Ethereum's TVL. Each migrating chain adds settlement activity and network effects to Ethereum. Counterpoint: the article notes L2s like Optimism, Katana and Linea run at a loss and Blast shut down, and some players (Circle's Arc, Stripe's Tempo, Hyperliquid) still build independent L1s.

Catalysts
  • ▲ Zilliqa announced last week it will become an Ethereum-based L2
  • ▲ Gnosis targets spring 2027 to relaunch as an Ethereum Economic Zone
Risk Factors
  • ▼ L2s like Optimism, Katana and Linea have expenses exceeding fee revenue
  • ▼ Blast was forced to shut down despite being an Ethereum L2
ZIL
Neutral 🤖 45%
📆 Mid-term 🌍 GLOBAL · Explicit

Zilliqa announced last week it will abandon its L1 architecture and become an Ethereum-based Layer 2, citing that 'usage never reached what a standalone chain needs' and dried-up funding and liquidity. This may improve the project's viability but reduces the standalone role of the token, and the news was already announced before this article.

Catalysts
  • • Zilliqa's plan to transition from an L1 to an Ethereum-based L2 announced last week
Risk Factors
  • • The project itself states usage never reached what a standalone chain needs
  • • Becoming an L2 does not automatically make a network profitable, per Bitwise's analyst

🧭 Full analysis of these assets

🎯 Key Takeaways

  • Zilliqa announced plans last week to transition from an L1 to an Ethereum-based Layer 2.
  • Gnosis targets spring 2027 to relaunch as an Ethereum Economic Zone.
  • Ronin completed its migration to Ethereum as an L2 in May.
  • Networks outside the top ten largest chains generate less than $1 million in annual fees collectively.
  • Major institutions like Circle, Stripe, and Hyperliquid continue to launch independent L1s despite the L2 migration trend.

📝 Executive Summary

Smaller blockchain networks are increasingly migrating to Ethereum as Layer 2 solutions to mitigate the high costs of independent security and liquidity. While Zilliqa, Gnosis, and Ronin have moved or plan to move to the Ethereum ecosystem, analysts note that L2 status does not guarantee profitability, as some networks still face expenses exceeding fee revenue.

❓ FAQ

ETH · Why are smaller blockchains moving to Ethereum?

Running an independent L1 requires funding execution, consensus, data availability, settlement and staking incentives. From 11th place onward, chains earn less than $1 million in annual fees collectively, while Ethereum offers shared security, settlement and liquidity at lower cost.

ETH · What does this mean for Ethereum holders?

More chains settling on Ethereum could strengthen its role as a liquidity hub, though L2 migration does not automatically make those networks profitable.

ZIL · Why is Zilliqa leaving its own blockchain?

The project said usage never reached what a standalone chain needs, funding and liquidity for standalone L1s dried up, and recent hacks showed how costly it is to secure a chain alone.